30 Jun 2013

Does Jesus support gay marriage?

Without doubt, the issue of gay marriage is one of the hottest topics around at this particular point in time.  As a Christian, it’s something I often get asked about, and sometimes lambasted about.  From one perspective, perhaps, this is all understandable.  For some, the progress towards what these days is often called 'marriage equality' represents a great triumph of reason over religion, and it is a great testament to the increasing irrelevance of ‘the church’.
Does Jesus support gay marriage?
Source: http://www.smh.com.au/world/gay-couples-win-landmark-case-20130627-2p04f.html
The issues involved in the debate are highly personal, and very sensitive.  For members of the GLBT community who would like to be married, it may well be personally painful, as well.  And undoubtedly, some people consider any Christian opposition to gay marriage as simply one expression of a much more general hostility towards gays.  For example, a gay couple once told me a story of how they were physically assaulted by a group of young men late one night in Sydney’s inner west.  I was appalled by their story.  And yet it’s possible that some people would consider Christian opposition to gay marriage in exactly the same basket - it’s just less physically intimidating and more institutional!
Without playing for extra sympathy, but simply to state the fact, if and when people do make put these responses into the same category, it puts Christians in a very difficult position.  In fact, it puts us into what is virtually an impossible position.  We seem to have gotten to the point where we have excluded even the possibility of Christians having a gentle, humble, and loving disposition towards gays, at the same time that they argue for a reasoned opposition to gay marriage.
Recently, however, I was struck by a photo of a man at a rally in support of gay marriage.  The rally took place in America, and was in response to the US Supreme Court striking down the Defence of Marriage Act (DOMA), which defines marriage as between a man and a woman, as well as a Californian state law prohibiting gay marriage.  The man was dressed as Jesus, and held a placard which read, ‘Marry who you love.’
On one hand, of course, such a statement being associated with Jesus probably has a certain plausibility to it, doesn’t it?  After all, Jesus was renowned for preaching a gospel of love.  What's more, he himself regularly, and scandalously, associated with prostitutes and tax collectors.  Surely, the church must be out of step with its master, mustn’t it?  Surely, Jesus would tell us to marry who we love, wouldn’t he?
But, in fact, no he wouldn’t.  And he didn’t.
In Matthew 19:3, some Pharisees come to Jesus with a question about the legality of a man divorcing his wife for any reason.[1]  Jesus answered,
“Haven’t you read that at the beginning the Creator ‘made them male and female,’ and said, ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh’?  So they are no longer two, but one. Therefore what God has joined together, let man not separate.”  (Matthew 19:4-6)
In answer to their question, Jesus goes back to the creation account of Genesis 2, showing that marriage from the beginning, in God’s good design, is both heterosexual and lifelong.
The Pharisees come back to Jesus in Matthew 19:7 asking that if this was what God intended for marriage, why did Moses give a command concerning divorce.  Jesus answered,
“Moses permitted you to divorce your wives because your hearts were hard. But it was not this way from the beginning. I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for marital unfaithfulness, and marries another woman commits adultery.”  (Matthew 19:8-9)
In other words, the law about divorce does not overturn God’s plan in creation, from the beginning.  It was simply a concession, given because of the hardness of people’s hearts.  Even in such a situation, however, remarriage could not be assumed simply as a right.  In fact, but for a situation of marital unfaithfulness, remarriage constitutes adultery.  Unexpectedly, then, the category of marriages that Jesus is opposed to is far greater than gay marriage only.
In Matthew 19:10 we hear the response of Jesus’ disciples:
“If this is the situation between a husband and wife, it is better not to marry.”
This is a great demonstration to us that the teaching of Jesus is not just foreign to our own day.  I think we sometimes imagine to ourselves that ‘back then’, people were naïve and gullible, and liable to be swayed by just about anything, but that in our day we are mature and enlightened, and we’ve ‘grown out of’ older positions on topics like marriage.  Such a view simply doesn’t line up with the evidence.  Jesus’ teaching was as challenging for his disciples then as it is for us today!
Yet still Jesus has more uncomfortable things to say:
Jesus replied, “Not everyone can accept this word, but only those to whom it has been given. For some are eunuchs because they were born that way; others were made that way by men; and others have renounced marriage because of the kingdom of heaven. The one who can accept this should accept it.” (Matthew 19:11-12)
Jesus doesn’t dispute the disciples’ conclusions that a person would be better not to marry, given the tight restrictions he has just placed on marriage and remarriage.  He accepts them completely!.  And then he identifies three examples of those who fit the category of unmarried:


  1. those who are born that way
  2. those who were made that way by men
  3. those who have renounced marriage voluntarily, because of an understanding of the greater realities of the kingdom of heaven
With respect to marriage, then, Jesus considers that there are only two groups of people: those who are in lifelong, heterosexual marriage, as God intended it from the beginning, or those who are unmarried, as he was, which could come about as a result of a number of causes.  One of these – those who are born as eunuchs – is particularly relevant for those who point to homosexual orientation as something that a person is born with, and therefore something that constitutes an illegitimate basis upon which to refuse marriage to someone. 
However, for Jesus, the fact that a person was born into this or that circumstance does not change the Bible’s basic teaching on marriage, which is that from the beginning God intended us to be either in lifelong, heterosexual marriage, or singleness.
We cannot understate how confronting such teaching is, not just for modern ears, but as we have seen, even for ancient ears as well.  However, what is important to recognise in all this, is that Christian ethics is always properly done ‘under authority’ - the authority of Biblical teaching.  This is because of the Christian conviction that the Bible is God’s powerful and authoritative Word.  Christian opposition to marriage is not, in the end, based on arguments from experience.  Or on arguments that use reason.  Or on arguments based on tradition.  Broadly speaking, these are the three main 'families' of argument that could be mounted as an alternative to arguments from Scripture.  But, no, Christian ethics must in the end be deduced from arguments based on Scripture.
Without doubt, Christians must learn to demonstrate a gentle, humble, and loving disposition towards gays - although this is, in fact, no less and no more than what we owe to everyone.  Yet it an area of enormous growth for many Christians that we express in attitude and action that homosexuality is no worse than any other category of sin.  After all, does not Paul include it right alongside disobedience to parents and gossip (e.g., Romans 1:26-32)?  Yet we have often not acted as though this were the case.
In the end, however, Christians are not free simply to ‘think up’ our own ethical answers, much less to ‘follow the leader’, which in this case may well be the shift in society’s answers on marriage.  It will not find us favour with the world, for almost by definition, the world does not accept the powerful and authoritative Word of God.  But this is the authority under which Christians must continue to find answers on how to live.









[1] I owe a great debt for the whole shape of this argument to a chapter in an excellent book called Battles Christians Face, by Vaughan Roberts.

28 Jun 2013

dealbreaker #1: Christians are self-righteous hypocrites

We’re thinking about dealbreakers, those ideas that stop people from accepting Christianity, that stop people from believing what Christians believe about God and about Jesus and about life in this world and how we should live it.
We’re going to start by thinking for a few minutes about a passage from a letter in the New Testament called 1 Corinthians.  It’s a well known passage.  It’s about love.
If I speak in the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I am only a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal.  If I have the gift of prophecy and can fathom all mysteries and knowledge, and if I have a faith that can move mountains, but have not love, I am nothing.  If I give all I possess to the poor and surrender my body to the flames, but have not love, I gain nothing. 
Love is patient, love is kind.  It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud.  It is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs.  Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth.  It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres.
Let me ask you: is that not one of the most beautiful reflections on the nature of love that you have ever heard.  You may have heard it a hundred times before, but does it not still catch your breath and leave you shaking your head in wonder.  It is a truly sublime passage.
What an attractive way of life is described here.  What a peaceful and kind and generous way of life is described here.  How truly incredible it would be to meet people who lived like this, who followed this way of love.  Which of, if you found a friend who treated you like this would not keep them for life?
And of course it doesn’t take Einstein to work out that this is meant to be the Christian way of life.  This passage is from the New Testament after all.  Sure, when the apostle Paul first wrote these words, he was thinking about a very specific situation in Corinth, which as a rebuke about the way that the Christians there were meant to be serving each other in the church.  But given how much the New Testament says about love as the fundamental quality of the Christian life, the fundamental characteristic of the Christian life, it’s not unreasonable to take this passage and apply it more generally.
And so here it is: this sublime description of the nature and characteristics of love, this astonishingly attractive way of life.  This is the standard that the Bible holds up for how Christians ought to live.
Source: www.noethics.net
But of course, by this point you may be sitting there thinking to yourself, ‘C’mon Wal.  Turn it up.  It’d be nice if it were all true, but it’s not.  Don’t get me wrong: the passage from 1 Corinthians is beautiful.  I’ve got no problem with that.  In fact I don’t even really have a problem with Jesus.  From everything I’ve heard he seems like a good guy.  No my problem is with Christians, because generally in my experience, Christians are self-righteous hypocrites.
They’re self-righteous, because they just think they’re better than everyone else, and they look down their noses at other people.  In their opinion, they are morally superior.  And anyone who lives differently is a degenerate sinner.  They stand proudly on the moral high ground, and and then they try and enforce their moral standards on everyone else.’
And you see this time and time again in the media, don’t you?  This is actually the public brand that lots of people think of when they think of Christianity.  For example if you’ve been listening to the news recently, there is a Christian lobby group that’s popped up in a bunch of different ways: first of all they’ve been arguing for legislation that makes it mandatory for ISP’s to block adult pornography and illegal content; then they were making noise when the Labor Party was debating its position on legislation for same-sex marriages; when a report came out earlier this year about child abuse within Catholic schools in Ireland, some people called for a Royal Commission in Australia - the Australian Christian Lobby said that would be an over-reaction; at the start of the year when The Australian Sex Party tried to enter the Queensland elections, they called on all the major parties to put them lowest on their preferences.
Now I’m not trying to debate the rights and wrongs of any of these things.  But for lots of people, just about every time an issue pops up, out come the self-righteous Christians, standing on the moral high ground, looking down on everyone else, and trying to enforce their morality across the board.
And yet at the same time, Christians can be so hypocritical as well.  They can say one thing in public and do something completely different in private.  They can preach one thing from the pulpit or street corner, and yet practice something completely different in the privacy of their own home.  They can go to church on Sundays and be all Christian, and then they can turn up to work on Mondays and you’d never ever know.
And sometimes, it’s Christian leaders who fall most spectacularly.  I worked out on Thursday there’s even a Wikipedia article devoted to the topic of scandals involving Christian evangelists.  And there was a story of one such preacher, who was president of the National Association of Evangelicals.  He was so far up the chain, he even had access to the President, George Bush.  Until one day it was revealed that Haggard had been regularly visiting a male prostitute, who was also providing him with methamphetamine.  He later admitted to another homosexual relationship, this time with a church member.
But of course as shocking as that is, it’s all quite distant and safe, isn’t it?  And the problem is for some people, this topic is up close and very personal.  There are some people tonight who have suffered greatly at the hands of people who said they were Christians, and yet who acted completely un-Christianly; people who have been one thing on the outside and something completely different on the inside.  Some of you have shared those stories with me.  Others of you: if we sat down over a cup of coffee this week, you could tell me straight off the bat, all the names, all the dates, all the places, where you’ve been hurt by hypocritical Christians.
And so sure the passage from 1 Corinthians is great.  In fact if there was a religion that helped people like that, you’d probably be pretty open to it.  But please don’t go saying that Christianity is the one, because experience tells you Christians don’t live like that.  Experience tells me that Christians are self-righteous hypocrites.
How should we respond to all these ideas?  What does a Christian person like me say to this objection that Christians are self-righteous hypocrites?
Well the first thing to say is that sadly there is a lot of truth to it.  I’d love to be able to stand here and say that wasn’t the case.  But it is.  Christians can be incredibly self-righteous.  They can stand on their own moral high ground and look down their noses at everybody else.  They can try to impose their own moral standards on others.
And boy can we be hypocritical.  Sometimes the gap between what we preach and how we actually live … well you could drive a truck through it.
And simply in the interests of complete honesty, if you have joined us for this dealbreakers series, let me tell you now that the longer you stay with us, the greater the chances are that you’ll see these things here.  The greater the chances are that you’ll see us being self-righteous, and hypocritical.  These are two of the biggest sins that Christians are in constant danger of falling into.
And if you’ve come along tonight because you knew this was the topic we were looking at, and because you’ve suffered in the past at the hands of self-righteous and hypocritical Christians, let me say on behalf of all the Christians here, I am sorry for how we have hurt you.  And I am sorry that we have damaged your view of Jesus.  I wish with all my heart that you had never had these experiences.
You say to me that Christians are self-righteous hypocrites.  And the first thing I need to say is yes, sadly, that is often the case.
And even Jesus agrees with you.
And it’s here I want us to think about two more passages.  The first one is from Luke 18:9-14.  It’s a story Jesus told about two men who went up to the temple to pray.  One was a Pharisee, the other was a tax collector.  And just to get our bearings straight, the Pharisees were the religious big dogs of the day.  They were scrupulously concerned with religious observance.  The tax collectors on the other hand, they were at the other end of the spectrum: the were national traitors, working in league with the Romans.  They were generally considered as dishonest, unethical and greedy.
And in Jesus’ story, these two men are up at the temple praying, the Pharisee prays first.  He stands up proudly.  He starts speaking in a loud voice.  He  says,
‘God I thank you that I’m not like other men: robbers, evildoers, adulterers – or even like this tax collector.  I fast twice a week and give a tenth of all I get.’
By contrast the tax collector stands at a distance.  He will not look up to heaven.  He beats his chest in anguish and he cries out,
‘God have mercy on me a sinner.’
And so two men up at the temple to pray.  Two very different prayers.  And you know what?  To the crowd who were listening to Jesus, by this point in the story, they would have been standing there nodding their heads in agreement.  Because both of these descriptions are exactly right - the description of the Pharisee, and the description of the tax collector.  The Pharisee was as unlike other men in religious observance as the tax collector was in need of God’s mercy.  These two descriptions are bang on the money.
But just then as everyone is nodding their heads in agreement, Jesus pulls the rug out from under them.  And he says that it was the tax collector not the Pharisee who went home justified before God, which is a way of talking about being in a right relationship with God, being accepted by God.  It was the tax collector who was accepted by God, not the Pharisee.
And the key to understanding this whole story is to understand why Jesus said it.  And the reason is given to us in v9:
To some who were confident of their own righteousness and looked down on everybody else, Jesus told this parable …
In other words Jesus tells this story, to combat and correct those who are self-righteous.  He tells this story to combat and correct those who are proudly confident of their own moral standing, and who look down their noses on everybody else.
Jesus knows that Christians can be self-righteous, and he hates it, which is why he taught against it.
He also hates hypocrisy, and he taught against that, too, in a place like Matthew 23.  Let me give you the highlights package:
v13 - Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You shut the kingdom of heaven in men’s faces.  You yourselves do not enter, nor will you let those enter who are trying to.v15 - Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites!  You travel over land and sea to win a single convert, and when he becomes one, you make him twice as much a son of hell as you are.v23 - Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites!  You give a tenth of your spices … But you have neglected the more important matters of the law …v25 - Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites!v27 - Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites!v29 - Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites!
Do you get the picture?  Jesus is talking to the most religious people of his day, the expert teachers of the Jewish law, and the Pharisees, who were scrupulous about religious observance.  And he is slam-dunking them for their hypocrisy, for being one thing on the outside and something completely different on the inside; for preaching one thing and practicing another.
Jesus knows that Christians can be hypocritical and he hates it, which is why he taught against it.
And so the second thing I want to say tonight is that if you think Christians are self-righteous hypocrites, I want to say, yes, they can be.  And Jesus agrees with you.  You and Jesus are actually in agreement on this one.  He hates it as well.
In fact he hates it more than you ever will.  Because it’s all done in his name.
So what, then, is the solution?  Well the solution is to let Jesus teach us what true Christianity is all about; to let Jesus teach us what authentic Christianity is all about.  You see sometimes behind the claim that Christians are self-righteous hypocrites lies a completely inaccurate and distorted view of what Christianity actually is.  For lots of people today, Christianity is a story about us and God whereby the way that we come into God’s presence, and the way that we become God’s friends, is by being a good person, by cleaning up our own life and getting our moral house in good order, so that God will accept us and let us into his presence.
And on this view what God requires of us is to have lived a good life, so that at the end of our days when we front up before God, he’ll put our lives up on the scales - all the good stuff we’ve done on one side, all the bad stuff we’ve done on another side - and as long the good stuff outweighs the bad, then we’re in and God will accept us.  Something like that is a very common view of what Christianity is all about.
According to Jesus, however, that is upside down, inside out, back to front.  Whichever way you want to describe it, it’s all wrong.  Because you know what?  If that’s what Christianity is about, then the Pharisee in Jesus’ story would have been home and hosed.  If that’s what Christianity is all about, God would have accepted him in a heartbeat.
You see he stood up and thanked God that he was not like other men: robbers, evildoers, adulterers – or even like the tax collector.  He fasted twice a week and gave a tenth of all he had.  And you know what?  He was telling the truth when he said these things.  This was no exaggeration.  He wasn’t like other men.  He wasn’t a robber or an evildoer, or an adulterer or a tax collector.  He was a Pharisee.  He fasted twice a week and gave a tenth of all that he had.  He was not lying when he said these things.  He was telling the truth.
But OK, then, what was the problem?  Do you remember the end of the story?  Jesus said it wasn’t him who went home justified before God, but the tax collector.  So how did the Pharisee go wrong?  What was the problem?
Well the problem was he thought all these things would merit his salvation.  He thought all these things would merit God’s acceptance of him.  The problem was he was confident in himself, which is exactly the kind of people Jesus told this story to in the first place, back in v9.
But a central message of the Bible is that there is not a single one of us who should be like that.  There’s not a single one of us who should be confident before God because of our own goodness.  You see God is holy, morally perfect in every way.  We are full of selfishness and sin, so that even our very best moral efforts are too weak and too falsely motivated  to ever merit God’s acceptance of us.
Let me try and show you what I mean by speaking personally for a minute.  Sometimes when I am speaking to people about Christianity, they will say to me that I am a good person and surely God will accept me.  And in some ways, to a certain extent, I get what they mean … a little bit.  On some measures, maybe, I am as good a candidate for the Pharisee as we could find on a typical Sydney street.  I’ve been a Christian since the late ‘80’s.  I’ve been in full time Christian ministry for almost a decade.  I have never been drunk in my life.  I have never done any illegal drugs.  I’ve only had sex in marriage with my wife.  I don’t swear.  I take a day off a week .  I give money to the poor. 
If you want to find a good moral person in this room tonight, I could be the guy, right?  Does that give me any credit or standing before God?  Does that mean that God should accept me?
Well before you answer those questions, let me tell you some more stuff about me.  Let me tell you about my bursts of anger.  Let me tell you about when I get jealous.  Let me tell you about my lustful thoughts.  Let me tell you about my greed.  Let me tell you about my pride.  Let me tell you how I have gossiped and slandered, and cursed people who have been made in God’s image.
And maybe you’re sitting there thinking to yourself, ‘C’mon Wal, don’t be so hard on yourself.  You’re only human.  Nobody’s perfect.’
No, they’re not.  And that’s the point.  Nobody is perfect.  Every single one of us has sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.  That is the Bible’s verdict on both you and I.  And I tell you what: the longer I’ve been a Christian the more that I see it is true, about me at the very least.  As each year goes by, I only become more and more aware of my own sin.  The Bible says that none of us, myself included, have any reason to be confident before God because of our own goodness.
Which is why Jesus says it was the tax collector who went home from the temple accepted by God.  Because what the tax collector did was recognize his sin, and cry out to God for mercy and grace.
And so according to Jesus, true Christianity is this: simply to depend on the mercy and grace of God and nothing else.  According to Jesus, this is the only way we will be accepted by God: because of his mercy and grace.  Our moral efforts are always too feeble, and too falsely motivated to ever merit salvation.  Jesus alone does that, by his perfect life, his death and resurrection.  And God gives it to us as a gift of mercy and grace.
True Christianity is the complete opposite of the idea that often sits behind the objection that Christians are self-righteous hypocrites.  It is not about us improving ourselves and getting our moral house in order so that God will accept us.  It’s about us recognizing our brokenness because of sin, and falling on God’s mercy and grace.
Now three quick implications.  First: if you are a Christian person, put self-righteousness to death.  I know I’ve said this before, but I think sometimes the way we work goes like this: we talk out loud about God’s mercy and grace, but then we secretly say to ourselves that we were natural candidates for God’s mercy and grace. 
But that is just self-righteousness and we must put it to death.  The truth is we were an unnatural candidates for God’s mercy and grace.  That’s why it’s called mercy and grace.  We must not stand on the moral high ground, looking down on everybody else, because Jesus teaches that we have no moral high ground to stand on.  There is just God’s mercy and grace.  We must put self-righteousness to death
Second: we must let God’s grace transform us.  If we have come to God crying out for mercy and grace, just like the tax collector did, and if we’ve heard God’s promise of acceptance and forgiveness, just like Jesus declared it for the tax collector, then we must let God’s grace transform us.  We must let God’s grace change us, and work on us to produce something new.
You see sometimes when Christian people continue to wallow in sin, it’s because we’ve actually got our own misunderstanding of true Christianity, our own misunderstanding of God’s grace.  We take something which for God was very costly - the death of his one and only Son, Jesus Christ - and we make it into something cheap, ike something that you can find in the bottom of a Cornflakes box.  And we say to ourselves, ‘Well God’s in the business of forgiving.  It’ll be OK.’
But what we must remember is that the whole way through the Bible, both Old Testament and New, God reserves his strongest condemnations for those who take his grace and turn it into a license for sin.  God’s mercy and grace is never a license for sin.  And so if we have experienced the mercy and grace of God, we must let ourselves be changed by that mercy and grace.
Finally, what about Jesus and that attractive way of love that we started with from 1 Corinthians 13?  To dismiss Christianity on the grounds that Christians are self-righteous hypocrites doesn’t stack up, it doesn’t stack up because it ignores what true Christianity claims about our nature and how we are saved, which is that we’ve all sinned and fallen short of the glory of God, and that we’re saved only by God’s mercy and grace.

If you want to evaluate Christianity, then, don’t look at Christians.  Look at Jesus.  For while he himself was perfect, he looked down on nobody.  And while he preached against hypocrisy, was himself completely authentic.  In fact, you go back to that passage on love from 1 Corinthians and it’s not hard to see that whilst it is there as the standard to which we should conform ourselves if we have been changed by the mercy and grace of God, it’s also the standard that Jesus lived by perfectly.

24 Jun 2013

A theology of work: part 4 - rest

Work at the end

Understandably, whatever the Bible teaches about work is only fully understood when we consider it alongside what the Bible teaches about rest.  In fact, if we look back at Gen 2:1-3, we find that the Bible has been teaching about rest for as long as its been teaching about work, for God worked in creation and then he rested from his work.
In the Ten Commandments the pattern of God’s work and rest was to become the pattern for Israel, working six days and resting on the seventh (Exod 20:8-11), as she modelled to the surrounding nations what it meant to be the people of God who were enjoying God’s work of salvation.  It would not do for Israel to exhibit the same kinds of workaholism that is so prevalent in cities like Sydney today.  Later on Israel was meant to enjoy rest in the Promised Land (e.g., Deut 12:10).  For a time she did (e.g., 2 Sam 7:1), although it was taken away from her in the judgment of the exile.
Then the Lord Jesus comes along, calling people in Mt 11:28-30:
Come to me, all who labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest.  Take my yoke upon you, and learn from me, for I am gentle and lowly in heart, and you will find rest for your souls.  For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light.”
Ultimately, of course, we will not rest until we take hold of that for which Christ Jesus has taken hold of us: the salvation that will be revealed in the last day, and which will take place in the New Jerusalem, where our songs of praise and thanksgiving will never end.  The Bible does not describe this future using the category of work, yet it doesn’t seem like too much of a stretch to consider it as a joyful work of God’s heavenly people, much as a greater fulfilment of the joyful work the first man and woman were to do.  Strictly, though, work will stop, but rest will continue.
I said a stupid thing the other day.  I was talking to a neighbour who commented about how busy I was.  To which I responded, ‘Better to burn out than to rust’.  What stupid male bravado is encapsulated in those words!
Perhaps as a choice between the two, one is better than the other.  But what a foolish response for someone who knows that God doesn’t want me to do either of them.  Work hard?  Absolutely.  Because work is good, and it’s a necessary part of life as God’s image-bearers in this world that God has made.  More than that, because we know that Jesus is Lord, and because he is always watching us, therefore we will work as to the Lord.  But rest as well?  Definitely.  Not for the sake of rusting, but rather for the sake of enjoying God’s good provision for our needs, and as an expression of our certain hope that through Christ we will enjoy God and his good work of salvation to the end of the ages.